Veyron beating mini?
My "In the Bath" thought this month (and for a few before that) is; twin Holeshot-Racing stage 5 Hayabusa engined mini, run on 17's should see a top speed of nearing 200mph (not that anyone with half a brain would feel comfy at that speed in a mini), but with over 1300bhp the 0-60 would be insane. Only limited by the grip of the rubber on the road...
Now has anyone got a spare £30k for me to build one?
-

Squig - Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 pm
- OilyFingers
- Posts: 1196
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:08 pm
- Location: Gloucester....(ish)
(Just tripled your budget but hey it's only got one engine so it would be road legal)
-

Relentless Rob - Posts: 5187
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 am
- Location: Norfolk
How about this for a more PPC alternative?
Old Celica GT4 (ST185?)
Remove original gearbox, prop & diff. Sell these to put towards 2nd engine.
Refit front engine using std 2wd Celica / MR2 'box.
Fit 2nd 3SGTE engine and 2wd 'box in the back driving the original rear hubs from the 4wd.
I know it's going to weigh a lot more than a twin bike engined mini but it'll still be a 600BHP 4WD rocketship!!
I reckon the 'road tuned' version could be done for just a few thousand, with the 1000BHP monster for under £10K.
-

TeamTotalWankel - Posts: 2356
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:46 pm
- Location: Barnsley
Squig wrote:Wasn't aware twin engined vehicles weren't road legal (@ Rob)
John Cooper built a twin engined Mini (Twini) in the 60's and it was banned from rallying for being too fast (twenty years before "Group B" gave Health and Safety a foot in to motorsport). You can drive a twin engined car on the road but one engine has to be disabled if I recall correctly.
I like the GT4+4 idea but I'd go for Dazzlers old Corrola. Cut a hole in the boot floor and drop an MR2 turbo engine and box in the back then swap the Corrolas engine for another MR2 turbo.
Blacked out windows or van pannels to keep it stealth (as stealth as Dazzlers old Corrola could be at least) as well.
-

Relentless Rob - Posts: 5187
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 am
- Location: Norfolk
The GT4 is a better shape to start with, but will need some modding to stay stable at speeds in excess of 170mph.
(can you tell I've looked into going over 200mph before?)
-

fha772 - Posts: 4955
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: Matlock-Bath, Derbyshire, United Kingdom
fha772 wrote:I think the GT4 would be the better starting point, purely because the biggest problem with hitting 200mph, is aerodynamics.
The GT4 is a better shape to start with, but will need some modding to stay stable at speeds in excess of 170mph.![]()
(can you tell I've looked into going over 200mph before?)
At risk of being chuckled at, would the Calibra not be a reasonable base as they are pretty aerodynamic, dirty cheap, IRS as standard allowing for a hub change to the 4x4 rear hubs, and a pair of LET engines aren't difficult to find, have 500bhp potential each, and allow for a starting point of 400bhp... not quite as good as the Celica idea but possibly cheaper
Good job this is in the bath thinking, as today I've had enough of Vauxhalls (mine specifically, refitting the F28 into a bay with no room to manouver it... it was a good job I couldn't reach my lump hammer!).
Aero wise I'd suggest on any of these a full under tray and some form of front splitter to pull the nose down and maintain that all important grip of the steering wheels and (really not sure here) would it make sense to run a smidge more power in the front lump anyway so the vehicle is pulling rather than pushing?
-

Squig - Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 pm
...an LPG tank where the passenger's supposed to go (to avoid surge issues and up the Ron a bit) and 600bhp per engine?
Ohhhh yes that's just about crazy enough to work. SAAB lumps are cheaper than Toyota ones as well.
-

Relentless Rob - Posts: 5187
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 am
- Location: Norfolk
Not for any construction and use regulation, road traffic act, highway code, IVA, SVA or any law for that matter.
Ready for this......
....you'd better sit down......
....since the DVLA "upgraded" their computers in 1994 the V5 certificate can not accept two engine numbers.
The quango's strike again.
-

Relentless Rob - Posts: 5187
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 am
- Location: Norfolk
How about a £9999 challenge? Can anyone build a 1000BHP (200mph) car for this sort of money? I think yes.....maybe.
BTW - Rob, who gives a toss about road-legal? We're talking ground breaking car bodgery here!!
-

TeamTotalWankel - Posts: 2356
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:46 pm
- Location: Barnsley
Power to Weight: 678 bhp/ton
0-60: 2.7
0-100: 4.9
60-100: 2.2
1/4 Mile ET: 9.87
1/4 Mile Terminal: 153
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile ET: 9.52
Dragstrip 1/4 Mile Terminal: 156
Bit poor really
-

TeamTotalWankel - Posts: 2356
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:46 pm
- Location: Barnsley
Thing is also I don't know you guys well enough to know if TTW is being serious or sarky with his last comment
incidentally I think I remember the cally having a drag co-efficent of .29... ***edited as I found the correct figure***
-

Squig - Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:44 pm
Return to In the Bath: Had any wild thoughts in the bath?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests






