Puma st 170
- OilyFingers
- Posts: 1196
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:08 pm
- Location: Gloucester....(ish)
The newer MPS 2.3 Turbo could be a tight (but achievable) squeeze. With the potential of over three hunderd broken horses reliably pulling the car down the road it certainly would give the spritefull Puma the power the chassis has always deserved.
Worth a look to see if DJM Motorsport still do much with the Puma as well.
-

Relentless Rob - Posts: 5177
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 am
- Location: Norfolk
OilyFingers wrote:You may find you can get 170 from the 1.7 without going near an engine mount.
I was thinking that as well. It seems a lot of faffing about for an extra twenty or so bhp if the donor ST170 is actually making 170 bhp. If the engine's tired or thrashed 150 would be optinistic.
Cam's, headwork, injectors and a map would do the same job. If you take it too far and something goes pop a replacement Puma engine would be a lot easier to find than a replacement ST one.
-

Relentless Rob - Posts: 5177
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 am
- Location: Norfolk
Regardless of what it says on the cam cover, the ST170 and RS engines are both just Zetec engines with different bits bolted to them, so the problem here is that the Zetec is the 'wrong' way round (inlet at the back) when compared to the Zetec SE (or Sigma, as it should be known)
My old car started life as a 1.25 16v Sigma engined car with an IB5 gearbox. The Puma is essentially the same setup, engine block is the same dimensions, gearbox is the same so for the purposes of this thread, it's the same conversion.
Ok, so it will physically fit, that's not a problem at all, the engine bay is actually quite big. The main issue is engine mounts. In my car, the OSF engine mount was the problem one. The whole inner wing had to be made from box section and sheet steel to make a position for the mount to er... mount to.
Other than that, it was relative plain sailing. Obvious hurdles like coolant pipes being the other way round are easily overcome.
Exhaust isn't too major I suppose, but as the original engine doesn't have a downpipe running under the sump, ground clearance is hampered.
Not that it'd be a problem with the ST170 engine, but the old BC/IB5 gearbox is weak. I broke 3 with 260bhp and 300lb/ft before getting bored and scrapping the car.
If I was doing it again, I'd use a Duratec (Fiesta ST150 is the best option) as it's the 'right' way round, the gearbox is better as it's an IB5plus, that means you can use the original shafts.
Engines are plentiful, cheap enough if you use a Mondeo 2 one and get a second hand Fiesta ST gearbox and need a lot less work to fit, the added bonus is that they're all alloy too, so they weigh the same as the 1.7 Sigma engine, meaning the Puma's wonderful balance is retained.
With some decent cams and a free flowing exhaust system, you'll see just shy of 200bhp (yes, really) and the engines will make 310bhp NA, 440bhp supercharged or, if your pockets are deep enough, 850bhp with a big snail bolted on.
I wouldn't even entertain any other engine swap in a Fiesta or Puma now.
- Robmarriott
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:14 pm
Return to In the Bath: Had any wild thoughts in the bath?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests






